Press Kit

Sto Lyko – To the Wolf | Press Kit (pdf 1.6 mb)

download the press kit

Cinema Scope review

“Hughes and Koutsospyrou focus their attention on people with almost comically limited options, and end up producing something richly suggestive. In a country that often trumpets its own sense of history, To the Wolf obliterates any nostalgia for an older way of life. The telephone towers that lurk like Martian tripods in the background only enhance the sense of isolation—information only flows one way here—but more than that, they look like something very Greek indeed: ancient relics. The predator of the movie’s title is time, which seems to be hunting in reverse. To the Wolf offers the strange sight of the distant past overtaking and devouring a hobbled, tense present.”

20.09.2013, Source: CINEMA SCOPE 56, by Adam Nayman

Filmmaker Magazine review

My favorite Greek discovery was ‘To The Wolf’, an almost visionary, crafted gem of nonfiction by Aran Hughes and Christina Koutsospyrou, shot in a secluded Greek village where two ragged families of shepherds, most members elderly, battle and struggle to survive in intense poverty. Without ever feeling derivative, it’s a meeting of Béla Tarr and Theo Angelopoulos, as weathered and wind-sheared and soppingly damp, but a piece with its own integrity. “Most of us have a biblical, romantic image of bucolic life,” Koutsospyrou says, “but in our film, we tried to capture the real life of shepherds without embellishing it,” countering Greek television documentaries about rural life. A mix of the visually magnificent and the behaviorally minute, To The Wolf, shot in grievously low light below the soak and slash of drenching gloom, conveys an ecstatic dystopia about what’s left behind after the exodus of generations of young to the cities and to farther reaches of the forbidding eurozone. “Greece is finished, it’s dead, it’s gone,” the most shambling of the beaten men murmurs. The film has a physical austerity to match the fiscal austerity imposed upon the most vulnerable of citizens.

10.05.2013, Source: FILMMAKER MAGAZINE, by Ray Pride

Frankfurter review

read the full article in english here

The greek word for “end” has a strange double-meaning. This becomes clear particularly in the end credits of the film Sto lyko: TELOS, it says in ominous letters. With the end a movement arrives at its goal. And the end seems to affect more than just the film. It radiates onto the landscape and the country in which this anti-shepard-idyll of Aran Hughes’ and Christina Koutsospyrous’ film is set. A low mountain range in western Greece. The knolls all carry the massive poles of a big power line. At the foot of these metal giants Giorgios keeps assembling his flock.


LIFO interview

Christina Koutsospyrou

διαβάστε όλο το άρθρο εδώ

Ολοκληρώσαμε την ταινία με δικά μας έξοδα, κάτι που ήταν αρκετά δύσκολο, αλλά καθώς την προχωρούσαμε σε στάδια, κάπως τα καταφέραμε. Οι προθέσεις μας ήταν σαφείς. Είχαμε μεν κινηματογραφήσει αληθινά κομμάτια ζωής και αληθινούς ανθρώπους, αλλά δεν θέλαμε να θυμίζει ντοκιμαντέρ. Οπότε, έπρεπε να βρούμε τρόπους να εντάξουμε και λίγο το στοιχείο της μυθοπλασίας, ώστε να αποφύγουμε τα κλισέ μιας ταινίας τεκμηρίωσης. Αυτό το πετύχαμε κυρίως στη διαδικασία του μοντάζ. Θα έλεγα ότι σχεδόν «σκάψαμε» μέσα στο υλικό ώστε να αναπτύξουμε ένα σενάριο. Στην πορεία ήρθαμε αντιμέτωποι με πολλές δυσκολίες, αλλά τελικά τα καταφέραμε. Φυσικά και ήμασταν απολύτως συνειδητοποιημένοι κατά τη διάρκεια των γυρισμάτων ως προς τον στόχο μας, αλλά η πραγματικότητα είναι πάντοτε απρόβλεπτη και ήταν αρκετές οι φορές που τα πράγματα δεν πήγαιναν όπως τα σχεδιάζαμε, κάτι που μας παίδεψε πολύ. Επειδή αυτή είναι η πρώτη μου εμπειρία στον κινηματογράφο, νιώθω φοβερά ικανοποιημένη που διακρίνω ένα ξεκάθαρο, αναγνωρίσιμο στυλ και αδημονώ να το δοκιμάσω ξανά σε ένα νέο περιβάλλον, με διαφορετική κάμερα, ανθρώπους, περιεχόμενο.

06.02.2013, Interview with Christina Koutsospyrou, Πηγή:, Φωτό: Nicolas Gaillard

FLIX interview

διαβάστε την συνέντευξη στα ελληνικά εδώ

How did you come up with the idea of “To the Wolf”?

We are not sure we if we ever really came up with the idea for “To the Wolf”, at least not in the traditional sense. Originally the film was planned to be about this very old traditional coffee house in the village. But from there we kept meeting people that interested us and we would end up visiting them or finding them out with their animals and we began to take an interest and focus on them. So it worked a bit like a casting, and once we had found our main characters, an idea of what the film could be started to take shape. But right up until the end of shooting this was never concrete or definite in our minds. It was really led by the characters how eager they were to be involved, and us having to constantly respond to what was being filmed.

“Greece is finished. It’s dead!” says one of the villagers. Is “To The Wolf” a film about the Greek financial crisis?

In our minds the film was about shepherds and the poverty in which they live. The crisis was only to serve as a reminder to what had been felt by these people for centuries if not millennia. It was however an interesting time to be exploring the subject. Paxnis, the shepherd you mention, really had foreseen this crisis. From the moment we met him he was going around telling everybody he felt that great poverty and hunger were coming. And this was before anything had really unfolded. Also, the film was shot in three stages over two years and the decline in fortunes each time we returned was a marked one, so it was impossible for the film not to become engulfed by it and therefore reflecting the crisis.

How would you describe “To The Wolf” in terms of being a mixture of documentary and fiction?

The foundations of the film are definitely documentary, however it was always our intention for the film to appear as a piece of docu-realism or ethno-fiction. There was a small amount of acting involved but largely what you see is the characters being themselves in their true condition. It was in the editing process that we feel we gave the film a sense of fiction. The structure for instance, the idea of it being set over four consecutive days, is obviously a fictional construct considering we shot it over four months in total. In addition the cinematography was intentionally static and slow rather than handheld or kinetic in anyway. This felt very unusual for this kind of film. Although, saying that, we are not really sure what kind of film this is. The more one delves into the divide between documentary and fiction the harder it becomes to define. For us the magic of filmmaking is selling the audience a trick that they willingly, wholeheartedly accept. The closer we can get to making this convincing, the better the magic trick. So, this was always in our minds.

The faces of your real life actors seem to tell stories on their own. How did you choose them?

We were definitely drawn to those kinds of people. The father and son were known to us before filming began and they were the first characters we wanted to concentrate on. We liked the fact they had this continuity and somehow represented a past and a future, both visually and conceptually. The mother began to feature more prominently as we progressed and became so important in explaining the dynamic of the family. The old shepherd Paxnis and his wife Kiki, we met at the end of the first shoot. We knew that when we returned we would have to include them in the film. They represented a different element, a more tragicomic one and were also an incredibly striking pair. Vasilo who is their friend, was important too. She added such a calming and abstract presence to the film.

How did you persuade the villagers to contribute to your film?

It wasn’t a matter of persuasion. Most people were happy to be involved and excited with the attention. Christina’s family connection with the village also meant we weren’t complete strangers. Generally though the openness of the people was the key element. They were so eager to invite us in to their lives and to give us their stories. With the main characters it was slightly different, we went beyond that. We developed more of a collaborative relationship and became very close to each other.

How difficult was it to shoot the film during a period of unrelenting wind and rain? What were the technical challenges of the shooting?

We were generally wet and cold most of the time, but it never stopped the shepherds and we were determined to reflect that. Technically, being just the two of us, it was very challenging. The most difficult aspect was time. We were essentially intervening in someone’s daily routine and they would rarely stop or wait for us so we had to be very quick and shoot as much as possible when we could. For all the successful footage that we did manage to get there was more, so much more, that we didn’t. It is interesting because this method breeds a certain originality. Since there is hardly any time to set up or compose the action, it becomes much harder to reference other directors ideas or even your own. It becomes an intuitive process.

There’s a powerful beauty in the melancholic images of the everyday rural life and the remote scenery of the Greek village. How did you manage to capture the essence of it?

It was really a question of the right light and weather conditions, on a sunny day these scenes would look so different. What we tried to capture in the cinematography was a poetic stillness in the landscapes and a kind of oppressive darkness in the interiors.

What does the official selection of the film in Berlinale’s Forum mean to you, since “To the Wolf” is an independent production and your first feature film?

After all the time, work and effort we have put in, this is the most gratifying moment. We are hoping it will open new doors and also set a path that enables us to go forward with this style of work. It has given us the confidence that any debuting directors would need in order to continue in the film world. It’s a deep dive but definitely a worthwhile one.

16.01.2013, Interview by Manolis Kranakis, Source: